Radiocarbon-dating adhesive and wooden residues from stone tools by Accelerator Mass Spectrometry (AMS): challenges and insights encountered in a case study
Abstract
In this study we present and assess a process to enhance archaeological residue AMS dating by focusing on contaminant confinement. The sequence of methods applied consists of: 1) optical residue and usewear analyses, 2) experimental designs addressing cleaning treatments to mitigate impact of contaminants,
3) preparation and extraction of residues from (mostly) previously dated stone artefacts, and 4) establishing the elemental characteristics of residues by using SEM/EDX as a final step to avoid sample contamination during analyses. We found the alkaline surfactant Decon 90 is a useful solution for removal of skin scales and fabric fibre but has limited effect on graphite contamination introduced by pencil lead. Adhesive residues were not affected by Decon immersion, however, wooden residues from bog sites were partly dislodged. While the methodological sequence was in general successful and some artefact residues were dated within the anticipated age range, difficulties were encountered with other lithic residues. Some artefact residues attained AMS dates which appear to be affected by modern
contaminants and other residue radiocarbon dates were seemingly affected by fossil shell derived from flint stone, plasticizers or from a fixative substance older than the fabrication and use of the artefact. One outcome from this study is that performing chemical residue identification earlier in the method sequence using non-destructive and non-contaminating methods would guide the choice of residue
treatment and improve reliability of age determination.
Bibliography
Yates, A., Smith, A., Bertuch, F., Gehlen, B., Gramsch, B., Heinen, M., Joannes-Boyau, R., Scheffers, A., Parr, J., Pawlik, A. (2015): Radiocarbon-dating adhesive and wooden residues from stone tools by Accelerator Mass Spectrometry (AMS): challenges and insights encountered in a case study. Elsevier – In: Journal of Archaeogical Science, Vol. 61, p: 14, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jas.2015.04.022
| author | Yates, A.B. and Smith, A.M. and Bertuch, F. and Gehlen, B. and Gramsch, B. and Heinen, M. and Joannes-Boyau, R. and Scheffers, A. and Parr, J. and Pawlik, A. |
|---|---|
| doi | http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jas.2015.04.022 |
| journal | Journal of Archaeogical Science |
| key | A.B.Yates2015 |
| month | May |
| pages | 14 |
| publisher | Elsevier |
| type | article |
| volume | 61 |
| year | 2015 |